Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 3220 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 19% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5620 - 151 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 15 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
373
41.722595078299776%
Multi-Core
1410
54.88516932658622%
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
