Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 1140 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5620 - 155 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 47 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
373
36.17846750727449%
Multi-Core
1410
46.29021667760998%
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
