Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5650U outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5650U is 1811 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5650U - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5650U
- Performs up to 17% better in Rust than Xeon E5620 - 177 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 15 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i7-5650U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
373
37.90650406504065%
Multi-Core
1410
75.56270096463022%
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i7-5650U |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 6000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
