Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 1637 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5620 - 302 vs 295 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 20 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
373
42.09932279909707%
Multi-Core
1410
26.21792487913723%
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
