Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1637 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 80 vs 85 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E5620 - 153 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
373
40.28077753779697%
Multi-Core
1410
35.28528528528528%
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
