Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 3400 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 10% better in God of War than Xeon E5620 - 178 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 24 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
