Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 120 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 23% better in Immortals of Aveum than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 48 vs 39 FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
48
100%
Value, £/FPS
£9.11/FPS
100%
Price, £
£437.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £437.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |