Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900K - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 191 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 95 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
191
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.07/FPS
100%
Price, £
£395
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |