Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 120 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 195 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 32 vs 24 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
195
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£486.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £486.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8347 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |