Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2176M outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2176M is 216 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 349 vs 344 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2176M - 16 vs 12 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
344
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.48/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2176M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |