Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Pentium B940 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2265 days newer than Pentium B940.
Advantages of Intel Pentium B940
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 10% better in No Man's Sky than Pentium B940 - 170 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium B940 - 16 vs 2 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
170
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.96/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium B940 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |