Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Pentium 987 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1672 days newer than Pentium 987.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 987
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 20% better in World of Warcraft than Pentium 987 - 178 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 987 - 16 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.92/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 987 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |