Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1632 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 21% better in Minecraft than Celeron G1840 - 736 vs 606 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - £49.95 vs £428.88
- Up to 86% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-9900K - £0.08 vs £0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 53 vs 95 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
736
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.58/FPS
13%
Price, £
£428.88
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for £428.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
606
82%
Value, £/FPS
£0.08/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |