Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 2896 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-12900KS - £49.95 vs £482.99
- Up to 81% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i9-12900KS - £0.54 vs £2.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 53 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 80% better in Far Cry 6 than Celeron G1840 - 166 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 24 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
92
55%
Value, £/FPS
£0.54/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
166
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.91/FPS
18%
Price, £
£482.99
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for £482.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |