Buy on Amazon
£238.88
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $422
Availability
MSRP in USD: $422
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1293 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 230 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - £163.79 vs £238.88
- Up to 26% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i9-11900F - £0.77 vs £1.04 per FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
230
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.04/FPS
74%
Price, £
£238.88
68%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-11900F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for £238.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
213
92%
Value, £/FPS
£0.77/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.79
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Processor - (8 Core/16 Threads) - YD190XA8AEWOF
Buy for £163.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
