Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 779 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 209 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 165 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - £163.79 vs £1034.19
- Up to 84% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-10920X - £0.81 vs £4.95 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
209
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.95/FPS
16%
Price, £
£1034.19
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for £1,034.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 311 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
201
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.81/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £163.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |