Buy on Amazon
£666.44
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 10% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 137 vs 124 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - £163.79 vs £666.44
- Up to 73% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Core i9-10900 - £1.32 vs £4.86 per FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.86/FPS
27%
Price, £
£666.44
24%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900 (base clock: 2.80GHz; socket: LGA1200; 65 Watt) box BX8070110900
Buy for £666.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
124
90%
Value, £/FPS
£1.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.79
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Processor - (8 Core/16 Threads) - YD190XA8AEWOF
Buy for £163.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
