Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3048 days newer than Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 20% better in Rust than Core i7-880 - 189 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 24 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
189
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.86/FPS
100%
Price, £
£351.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £351.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
40.816326530612244%
Multi-Core
1653
22.17601287899115%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Lynnfield | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |