Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3537 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 17% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-3770K - 110 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - £68.28 vs £225.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-3770K - £0.62 vs £2.39 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
110
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.62/FPS
100%
Price, £
£68.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £68.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |