Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700 is 1608 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 197 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-12700 - £163.79 vs £257.46
- Up to 26% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-12700 - £0.97 vs £1.31 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
197
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.31/FPS
74%
Price, £
£257.46
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for £257.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
169
85%
Value, £/FPS
£0.97/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £163.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |