Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i5-4590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1218 days newer than Core i5-4590.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-4590 - 332 vs 326 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590 - 16 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
332
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.49/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14532 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4590 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |