Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i5-2435M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2191 days newer than Core i5-2435M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2435M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 178% better in League of Legends than Core i5-2435M - 153 vs 55 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2435M - 16 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
153
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.07/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10970 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2435M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |