Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-10400F - 255 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - £102.3 vs £195.78
- Up to 45% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-14400F - £0.42 vs £0.77 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
255
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.77/FPS
54%
Price, £
£195.78
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for £195.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 342 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
242
94%
Value, £/FPS
£0.42/FPS
100%
Price, £
£102.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £102.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |