Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £98.8 vs £499.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-13900K - £0.54 vs £1.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 59% better in War Thunder than Core i5-10400F - 290 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
62%
Value, £/FPS
£0.54/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £98.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16945 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
290
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.72/FPS
31%
Price, £
£499.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for £499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16944 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |