Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 468 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - £212.71 vs £308.97
- Up to 24% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-13700K - £0.89 vs £1.17 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 10% better in Rust than Core i5-14400F - 263 vs 239 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
239
90%
Value, £/FPS
£0.89/FPS
100%
Price, £
£212.71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £212.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
263
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.17/FPS
76%
Price, £
£308.97
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for £308.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |