Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 734 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G6900 - 132 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - £50.0 vs £198.72
- Up to 74% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-14400F - £0.4 vs £1.51 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
132
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.51/FPS
26%
Price, £
£198.72
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for £198.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Buy for £50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |