Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8109U outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8109U is 217 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8109U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 28 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8109U - 16 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
170
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.96/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17669 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 5th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8109U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Iris Pro Plus | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |