Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1218 days newer than Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Minecraft than Core i3-4150 - 671 vs 666 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 16 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
671
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.24/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |