Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 1098 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 162 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 28 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-1125G4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
157
96%
Value, £/FPS
£1.04/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £163.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |