Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10300 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10300 is 973 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 354 vs 344 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £124.0 vs £163.75
- Up to 27% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £0.35 vs £0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 16 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
354
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.35/FPS
100%
Price, £
£124
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £124 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18751 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
344
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.48/FPS
72%
Price, £
£163.75
75%
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18752 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |