Buy on Amazon
£109.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $120
Availability
MSRP in USD: $120
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1697 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G3900 - 161 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X Processor (4C/8T, 18 MB Cache, 4.3 GHz Max Boost)
Buy for £109.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen 3 3300X
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
34.790419161676645%
Multi-Core
992
17.124115311582944%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
