Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3470 is 1187 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-3470 - £19.99 vs £63.11
- Up to 68% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-3470 - £0.16 vs £0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 51 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Performs up to 1% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G3900 - 126 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
125
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2617 minutes ago
Buy for £63.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2617 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |