Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1684 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 21% better in Dota 2 than Celeron 1037U - 195 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 16 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
195
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.84/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £163.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |