Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3438 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of FX-4350
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - £137.33 vs £232.08
- Up to 3% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-13600K - £0.31 vs £0.32 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 62% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-4350 - 723 vs 446 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £137.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 855 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
723
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.32/FPS
97%
Price, £
£232.08
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for £232.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 855 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4350 | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |