Buy on Amazon
£137.33
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP $799
Availability
MSRP $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2747 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of FX-4350
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - £137.33 vs £295.00
- Up to 47% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Ryzen 9 5950X - £1.26 vs £2.38 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 14% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-4350 - 124 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 32 vs 4 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-4350 4-Core Processor (125W, AM3+, 12MB Cache, 4300MHz)
Buy for £137.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Processor (16Cores/32Threads, 105W TDP, Socket AM4, 72MB Cache, Up to 4.9 GHz Max Boost, no cooler)
Buy for £295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Ryzen 9 5950X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4350 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
