Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 3823 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of FX-4350
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - £137.33 vs £349.00
- Up to 47% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-14700K - £1.18 vs £2.24 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 34% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-4350 - 156 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 28 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £137.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7125 minutes ago
Buy for £349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7125 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4350 | vs | Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |