Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3438 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of FX-4350
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - £137.33 vs £929.89
- Up to 80% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen 9 7900X - £0.61 vs £3.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 125 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 33% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than FX-4350 - 298 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £137.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7117 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
298
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.12/FPS
20%
Price, £
£929.89
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for £929.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7117 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4350 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |