Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3823 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of FX-4350
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £137.33 vs £435.39
- Up to 54% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i9-14900K - £0.62 vs £1.36 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 43% better in Lost Ark than FX-4350 - 319 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £137.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7106 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
319
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.36/FPS
46%
Price, £
£435.39
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for £435.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7106 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4350 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |