Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3537 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of FX-4350
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £137.33 vs £1179.89
- Up to 79% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £2.33 vs £10.92 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 83% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-4350 - 108 vs 59 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Buy for £137.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
108
100%
Value, £/FPS
£10.92/FPS
21%
Price, £
£1179.89
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for £1,179.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4350 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |