Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1752 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 16% better in Dota 2 than FX-8350 - 195 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
