Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1564 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i7-4800MQ - 180 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 47 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 47 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
