Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1439 days newer than Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 9% better in War Thunder than Core i3-4130T - 166 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i3-4130T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
|---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
