Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1067 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 185 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 120 vs 180 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
