Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 685 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-8350 - 229 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 85 vs 125 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell-E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 85 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |