Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 2268 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than FX-8350 - 264 vs 253 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
