Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1162 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 7% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 129 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 105 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - £163.79 vs £329.99
- Up to 47% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 9 5950X - £1.35 vs £2.56 per FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £329.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 369 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
121
93%
Value, £/FPS
£1.35/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £163.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vermeer | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |