Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6350 is 565 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 30% cheaper than FX-6350 - £35.24 vs £49.99
- Up to 29% better value when playing Remnant II than FX-6350 - £0.45 vs £0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 1% better in Remnant II than FX-6100 - 79 vs 78 FPS
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |