Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1910 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - £35.24 vs £58.88
- Up to 34% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-7100 - £0.19 vs £0.29 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-6100 - 202 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Buy for £58.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |