Buy on Amazon
£49.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1713 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6100 - 156 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
156
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Corp. BX80660E51620V4 Xeon Processor E5-1620 v4
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1609 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
