Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2961 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 41% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - £35.24 vs £60.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Rust than Athlon 3000G - £0.23 vs £0.34 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 16% better in Rust than FX-6100 - 175 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Buy for £60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Athlon |
Zambezi | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |